[70 NEC 2020] 70 National Electrical Code, 2020 Edition|NPFA 70 National Electrical Code 2020|70, National Electrical Code, 2020 Edition|70 Nec 2020 paperback

Book is in mint condition. Packaged very nicely and arrived two weeks earlier than expected.

Excellent shape and well packed; expedient service

I will have to admit, I’m always very skeptical buying products from unknown sources but I will say, this purchase was a home run! Book is in brand new/perfect condition. Shipping was 5 days earlier than it said. Book was packed great as well. 100% satisfied!!

Fast FREE delivery with a nice little bookmark gifted from the seller :)

Exactly as advertised

Well i went ahead and ordered a book anyway even after reading all the bad reviews about poor text and looking like a photocopy. Got mine yesterday 1/12/22 and I must say mine looks like a genuine version. No weird writing and no faded areas. I didn’t worry about buying it since Amazon has a good return policy, so worst case I would just return it if I wasn’t happy. But I’m glad I got a good copy of it. Cheaper than buying off the NEC website.

Not sure where this code book came from or if it is a factory 2nd (if there is such a thing) but there are a large number of typo's in this specific version. I have compared with other coworkers 2020 books and theirs do not have the typos that this one has. Typos are mostly on the numbering of the sections for example 110.26 then goes to 110.23 (should be 110.27 and 110.23 was already covered) 110.28 was also mislabeled. Information seems to be in the correct order but if you are using for a test or using index to look up and 110.27 or 110.28 does exist it makes it difficult. Also, there are a lot of typos on dimensions. One example is 139.7 mm (5!4in) the only way I was able to determine it should be 5 1/2in was to use a mm to in converter. This would not work if you were using it for a test. I ended up having to borrow a coworkers codebook to study because there was not certainty that the information in this book is correct because there are just too many discrepancies found just skimming and highlighting. I bet i found 10+ and this is only covering about 1/4 of the information in this book.

like new condition